Biostimulant Effect of Microorganisms on in vitro Germination of Hybrid Pepper Seeds

Efecto bioestimulante de los microorganismos sobre la germinación in vitro de semillas híbridas de pimiento


https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol25_num1_art:3306

Autores: José Humberto Vera Rodríguez*, Diego Barzallo, Mónica del Rocío Villamar Aveiga, Johnny Xavier Barcia-Anchundia

Resumen

In Ecuador, pepper cultivation plays a vital role at the socio-economic level since it represents a significant income for several farmers. This work aims to evaluate the biostimulant effect of microorganisms on the in vitro germination of hybrid Yolo Wonder and Marcono Dulce Largo pepper seeds. The experiment was conducted under a completely randomized design through five treatments with five repetitions and fifteen experimental units per repetition. The treatments used were T0 (Control), T1 (Trichoderma harzianum), T2 (Azotobacter vinelandii), T3 (Bacillus polymyxa), and T4 (Azospirillum brasilense) inoculated in Petri dishes with an absorbent polystyrene pad at 1 x 109 CFU/ml, which was dosed with 35 mg/10 ml in distilled water both at sowing and on the seventh day after. In addition, the variables evaluated were germination percentage, radicle and coleoptile emergence, seedling weight, and radicle and coleoptile length. The data obtained were processed by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s comparison of means at a 5 % error probability. Noticeable stimuli were observed on the variables studied with the inoculation of different microorganism strains, the T4 treatment showing the best results, and no differences were obtained when using various pepper genotypes. Importantly, this research was carried out under specific conditions and with particular genotypes of pepper seeds. Therefore, the results may vary in other conditions and with different genotypes under the biostimulant effect of microorganisms on the in vitro germination of hybrid pepper seeds.

Introducción

The fruits of the pepper plant ( Capsicum annuum L.) are highly valued worldwide due to their nutritional content and excellent properties. They are used as a medicine and a condiment in the food industry ( Guerra et al., 2020 ). Therefore, seed germination is a fundamental process in plant reproduction since it determines success in crop production.

In Ecuador, the pepper is cultivated in several provinces, mainly tropical areas. Farmers have had to incorporate new improvement techniques to increase their production rates and obtain greater profitability from the crop ( Delgado et al., 2022 ). In this context, using microorganisms as biostimulants has proven an effective strategy to improve seed germination and promote seedling growth.

Agriculture generally exhibits problems that include phytopathogenic microorganisms (viruses, bacteria, and fungi), which cause damage to crops ( Albarracin-Gomez et al., 2023 ). Farmers have widely used chemicals to prevent damage, but they cause soil desertification and environmental pollution. Thus, a sustainable solution is using biological products ( Camelo et al., 2011 ; Mora et al., 2023 ).

Agricultural bioproducts offer numerous advantages, with one notable benefit being the application of efficient microorganisms for crop inoculation. This practice enhances crop growth, development, and protection effectively and sustainably ( Chávez-García et al., 2023 ; Liriano et al., 2021; Lobo, 2008 ). Microbial seed coating is used to apply beneficial microorganisms, such as plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), rhizobia, and fungi, onto seeds. It aims to enhance crop growth and yield by improving nutrient availability and protecting against diseases and pathogens ( Rocha et al., 2019 ). Coating seeds with these beneficial microbes offers an efficient way to deliver them and shows promise as a method for inoculating various crop seeds with reduced inoculant usage compared to traditional seed treatments. The formulation of a typical inoculant includes the selection of a specific microorganism, an appropriate carrier, and relevant additives ( Vassilev et al., 2020 ). Each microorganism has various mechanisms of action, which can be widely used in agriculture, providing significant benefits to them ( Quispe-Quispe et al., 2022 ). Therefore, PGPB promotes plant nutrient absorption and homeostasis and enhances antioxidant activities during saline stress ( Kumar et al., 2020 ).

Moreover, efficient microorganisms allow the production of vegetables at a low cost ( Calero et al., 2019 ; Quispe-Quispe & Salas-Macías, 2022 ). Thus, this work aims to evaluate the biostimulant effect of microorganisms on the in vitro germination of hybrid genotypes of Capsicum annuum L. Experiments will be carried out under controlled laboratory conditions using different concentrations and combinations of microorganisms. Germination rate, time, percentage, and other parameters related to seedling growth will be measured. The results of this study are expected to provide valuable information on the ability of microorganisms to improve the germination of hybrid pepper seeds. This may have significant implications for agricultural production, as it could allow for the development of more efficient and sustainable methods for crop production.

Materials and Methods

Location of the Experimental Site

The present investigation was conducted in the Plant Biotechnology laboratory at the Faculty of Sciences and Engineering of the Universidad Estatal de Milagro (UNEMI), located in the University Citadel Km 1.5 via Km 26, Milagro, Guayas, Ecuador.

Plant Material

Two hybrid genotypes of Capsicum annuum L. pepper seeds (Yolo Wonder and Marcono dulce largo) were used. The seeds were washed with water and liquid soap for 10 minutes ( Salgado-Escobar et al., 2020 ). Subsequently, they were submerged (2.5 g l -1 ) in a solution with 50 % Captan for 3 min and immediately rinsed with distilled water to remove all residues ( Uribe et al., 2008 ). Afterward, the seeds were washed with 5 % sodium hypochlorite solution for every 100 ml of water for 10 min ( Cárdenas-Burgos et al., 2019 ) and then rinsed sufficiently with distilled water. Finally, they were submerged in a 3 % (v/v) hydrogen peroxide solution in water for 10 min ( Flores García et al., 2008 ).

Experiment Design and Statistical Analysis

The experiment was established under a completely randomized design (CRD), considering five treatments with five repetitions and fifteen experimental units per repetition. The treatments were distributed as follows: T0 (Control); T1 ( Trichoderma harzianum); T2 ( Azotobacter vinelandii ); T3 ( Bacillus polymyxa ); T4 ( Azospirillum brasilense ). The strains come from the Microbiolab S.A. laboratory in Quito, Ecuador. The data obtained from all the parameters studied was analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s test with 0.05 % as the significance level through the statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics® version 23.0.

Treatment

Sterile polystyrene absorbent pads were placed into glass Petri dishes (100 x 20 mm) to inoculate the lyophilized microorganisms at a concentration of 1 x 10 9 CFU/ml and a dose of 35 mg/10 ml in distilled water, both at seeding and the seventh day after.

Once the Petri dishes were sealed, all the treatments were placed in a compact climatic chamber for plant growth (ICH-FDA Brand, Model MP-BILC-600-C, Barcelona) with a total capacity of 600 liters. They were placed at a constant temperature of 26 °C with 75 % humidity and total darkness for 24 hours. Then, the conditions were modified with 70 % humidity, a constant temperature of 25 °C, and alternating eight hours with a light intensity of 1,500 lux and 16 hours of darkness.

The performance of the seeds was evaluated for 12 days using the positive germination criteria (radicle and coleoptile emergence), taking into account the following variables: germination percentage (%), radicle emergence (d), seed emergence coleoptile (d), seedling weight (g), radicle length (mm), and coleoptile length (mm). The weights were taken using a 220 g analytical balance (BOECO Brand, Model BAS 31 PLUS, Poland) with a precision of 0.0001 g. In contrast, the longitudinal measurements were taken with a rectified stainless-steel caliper (BEST VALUE Brand, Mechanic, Ecuador) with a measuring range of 0.000-6 in.

Results and Discussion

Table 1 presents the results obtained from the biostimulant effect of microorganisms on the in vitro germination of hybrid pepper seeds during 12 days of evaluation.

Table 1 Biostimulant effect of microorganisms on seed germination of hybrid pepper seeds in the laboratory Genotype Variable Treatments SE (±) p -value T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 Yolo Wonder Germination percentage (%) 84.67 b 87.00 ab 84.67 b 91.00 ab 93.00 a 1.73 0.020 Radicle emergence (d) 6.00 b 5.00 a 5.33 ab 5.00 a 5.00 a 0.15 0.002 Coleoptile emergence (d) 9.33 b 8.00 a 9.00 b 8.00 a 8.00 a 0.15 0.000 Seedling weight (g) 0.22 c 0.48 ab 0.45 b 0.54 a 0.55 a 0.02 0.000 Radicle length (mm) 10.27 b 17.83 a 16.86 ab 18.64 a 19.47 a 1.51 0.010 Coleoptile length (mm) 12.79 b 16.96 a 15.45 ab 18.01 a 18.07 a 0.76 0.003 Marcono Dulce Largo Germination percentage (%) 80.00 a 84.67 a 89.00 a 89.00 a 91.00 a 2.60 0.079 Radicle emergence (d) 6.00 b 5.00 a 5.33 ab 5.00 a 5.00 a 0.15 0.002 Coleoptile emergence (d) 9.33 b 8.00 a 9.00 b 8.00 a 8.00 a 0.15 0.000 Seedling weight (g) 0.23 b 0.47 a 0.46 a 0.48 a 0.49 a 0.03 0.000 Radicle length (mm) 9.67 b 17.67 ab 16.33 ab 18.87 a 19.67 a 1.96 0.031 Coleoptile length (mm) 10.07 b 18.52 a 17.39 a 20.18 a 20.42 a 0.98 0.000 a , b Different letters within a row indicate significant differences in Tukey's test at P < 0.05. SE: Standard Error. T0 (Control); T1 ( Trichoderma harzianum ) ; T2 ( Azotobacter vinelandii ); T3 ( Bacillus polymyxa ); T4 ( Azospirillum brasilense ). Source: Prepared by the authors.

The comparison of means between treatments shows statistically different groups for all the variables studied (germination percentage, radicle and coleoptile emergence, seedling weight, radicle and coleoptile length) using microorganisms in both pepper genotypes studied, i.e., Yolo Wonder and Marcono Dulce Largo. However, no difference was found in the percentage of germination obtained in the latter. This data was corroborated by Liriano et al.’s (2021) study. They observed a positive effect on the growth and quality of pepper plants in the seedbed when using microorganisms such as Bacillus spp. , Pseudomonas spp. , Trichoderma, Aspergillus, Rhizopus, Mucor, Penicillium, and Saccharomyces spp., thus achieving plants with a height of 17.19 cm, root lengths of 8.82 cm, and increased weight. These findings demonstrate the potential of the microorganisms studied to stimulate root growth and development and aerial organs in pepper plants.

The benefits of efficient microorganisms include restoring the microbiological balance of the soil. In addition, the diversity of interrelationships between microorganism species in the environment could be synergistic or antagonistic, and abiotic and biotic factors could influence physical-chemical and biological competition. They affect the plant-soil-microbiota-environment interaction, directly impacting plant growth and development ( Cano, 2011 ).

The seed germination percentage variable was slightly higher in treatment T4, with 93 % germination in the Yolo Wonder genotype. At the same time, no differences were found between treatments for the Marcono Dulce Largo genotype. However, using this same microorganism, the best results were obtained for germination (91 %) compared to the other treatments. According to Reyes et al. (2008 ), inoculating peppers with Azospirillum strains increased their germination percentage significantly. Moreover, they observed some specificity between Azospirillum and the crop type depending on the microorganism used. Some need mutual symbiosis with other strains to enhance their effect on plants or are specific to certain plant species.

The results of the radicle emergence were similar among treatments T1, T3, and T4, where root appearance was observed on the fifth day after sowing. In contrast, in treatments T0 and T2, it occurred the following day for both genotypes. This is probably due to certain microorganisms' specificity in coexisting with particular plant species, allowing them to develop properties that promote plant growth ( Romero-García et al., 2016 ). The availability of the metabolic potential of microorganisms will depend on several factors, including the competitive capacity of microorganisms, temperature, humidity, pH, soil type, nutrient availability, and inoculum concentration ( Hernández-Ruíz et al., 2017 ).

Trichoderma species are microorganisms commonly used as plant growth promoters, but their effect is limited depending on the crop type, development conditions, and concentration of microorganisms ( Stewart & Hill, 2014 ). The Bacillus polymyxa bacterium is a biological control agent because it can produce antibiotics and other antibacterial and antifungal substances, preventing the development of plant pathogens ( Pozo et al., 2006 ). In addition, Azospirillum allows for an increase in the plant’s growth, leaf area, and root volume, where cases of double production have also been noted ( Jarquín-Rosales et al., 2023 ).

The analysis of the coleoptile emergence begins with the appearance of its apex for T1, T3, and T4 on the eighth day after sowing; however, in treatments T0 and T2, it occurs from the ninth day in both pepper genotypes evaluated. Quispe-Quispe et al. (2022 ) argue that microorganisms such as Trichoderma , Bacillus , Streptomyces, and Pseudomonas act as biostimulants, improving some agronomic and productive components in plants. Still, they could also inhibit and reduce the growth of pathogenic microorganisms that negatively affect germination. Certain microorganisms have biofertilizer and biostimulant applications, influencing various physiological responses of crops; thus, germination and emergence can be influenced by factors such as temperature, humidity, light, and oxygen, among others.

There were differences in seedling weight of Yolo Wonder and Marcono Dulce Largo pepper genotypes between treatments. The best results were reported with treatment T4 with a weight of 0.55 and 0.49 g for each genotype, respectively. These results coincide with the data found by Cervantes-Vázquez et al. (2022 ), which describe a heavier weight of the plant when using Azospirillum and easy adaptability in the cultivation of Capsicum annuum L., translating into a greater yield and fruit quality unlike conventional systems ( Vásconez et al., 2020 ). In this way, Azospirillum significantly promotes rooting, fresh weight of roots and foliage, stem diameter, and plant height ( Palomino-Malpartida et al., 2023 ). The use of PGPB has shown to be a critical biotechnological alternative since it promotes the growth of plants with a relevant production of biomass after sowing ( Criollo et al., 2012 ).

Regarding radicle length, differences between treatments are shown; however, the best results were reported with treatment T4, with 19.47 mm for Yolo Wonder and 19.67 mm for Marcono Dulce Largo. The treatment T0 achieved 10.27 mm and 9.67 mm, respectively. Associations of Azospirillum strains act as biofertilizers promoting root growth and plant root hairs ( Rangel-Lucio et al., 2011 ), which may be limited in vitro . However, in situ, it could express its maximum capacity by trapping other nitrogen sources, fixing and incorporating them into plants to promote their development, as reported in the literature ( Restrepo-Correa et al., 2017 ).

For the coleoptile length, all the treatments with microorganisms (T1, T2, T3. and T4) were superior to the control in both pepper genotypes studied. Despite this, the best averages were obtained when inoculating Azospirillum brasilense in pepper seeds. Azospirillum improves plant development due to the release of auxins, gibberellins, and cytokinins, which encourage Azospirillum to fix nitrogen, producing positive effects on plant height, stem diameter, and weight ( Pérez-Velasco et al., 2019 ).

Few studies have been reported describing the benefits of Azospirillum on vegetables. However, some others have begun to explore the potential of these bacteria to improve the yield and quality of vegetables. These research studies have revealed that Azospirillum can promote root growth, increase nutrient absorption, and improve disease resistance in vegetable plants. Although more research is still needed, these findings suggest that Azospirillum could become a promising tool for vegetable farming.

Due to the results obtained in this work and the importance of Azospirillum as a biostimulant in pepper cultivation at an in vitro level, the findings by Domingues Duarte et al. (2020 ) indicate that Azospirillum brasilense is a group of PGPB found in the soil in different territories. It also has the ability to associate with plant roots, stimulating root and aerial development and increasing production and economic benefits to farmers, which come from the production of auxin-type growth-promoting phytonutrients. Thus, efficient microorganisms capable of promoting plant development are considered an alternative to biofertilization ( Pedraza et al., 2010 ) to help reduce the application of synthetic fertilizers ( Torres Pérez et al., 2022 ).

In the case of cucumber seeds, a commercial preparation of T. harzianum was used as a seed coating agent, resulting in higher seedling emergence and increased fresh shoot weight than untreated seeds ( Pill et al., 2009 ). Additionally, Trichoderma spp. proved to be effective in enhancing germination and seedling growth of Cucurbita pepo under various salinity stress conditions (50 and 100 mM NaCl solution; Afzal et al., 2020 ), as well as for Cuminum cyminum under drought conditions. In a separate study, different strains of T. harzianum and Pseudomonas fluorescence bacteria were applied to the seeds, leading to an increase in soluble protein and antioxidant enzyme activity in the inoculated seeds compared to a control group without inoculation, ultimately resulting in improvements in some morphological indicators ( Piri et al., 2019 ).

This demonstrates the effectiveness of additional ex-situ and in-situ preservation techniques, giving preference to the type of genetic material used ( Arias & Cano, 2009 ). The adequate inoculation of efficient microorganisms could be a viable strategy within the processes of plant micropropagation in space during the acclimatization phase, transferring the plants to the field with an already established microbiota and contributing to a better adaptation under the conditions established in the field ( Pérez Moncada et al., 2015 ).

Yolo WonderGermination percentage (%)84.67 b87.00 ab84.67 b91.00 ab93.00 a1.730.020
Radicle emergence (d)6.00 b5.00 a5.33 ab5.00 a5.00 a0.150.002
Coleoptile emergence (d)9.33 b8.00 a9.00 b8.00 a8.00 a0.150.000
Seedling weight (g)0.22 c0.48 ab0.45 b0.54 a0.55 a0.020.000
Radicle length (mm)10.27 b17.83 a16.86 ab18.64 a19.47 a1.510.010
Coleoptile length (mm)12.79 b16.96 a15.45 ab18.01 a18.07 a0.760.003
Marcono Dulce LargoGermination percentage (%)80.00 a84.67 a89.00 a89.00 a91.00 a2.600.079
Radicle emergence (d)6.00 b5.00 a5.33 ab5.00 a5.00 a0.150.002
Coleoptile emergence (d)9.33 b8.00 a9.00 b8.00 a8.00 a0.150.000
Seedling weight (g)0.23 b0.47 a0.46 a0.48 a0.49 a0.030.000
Radicle length (mm)9.67 b17.67 ab16.33 ab18.87 a19.67 a1.960.031
Coleoptile length (mm)10.07 b18.52 a17.39 a20.18 a20.42 a0.980.000

Conclusions

The biostimulant effect of microorganisms was demonstrated on the in vitro germination of hybrid Capsicum annuum L. pepper seeds at a dose of 35 mg/10 ml of distilled water with a concentration of 1 x 10 9 CFU/ml, inoculated at sowing and the seventh day after. The impact of the different strains of microorganisms used ( Trichoderma harzianum, Azotobacter vinelandii, Bacillus polymyxa, and Brazilian Azospirillum ) on the germination percentage, radicle emergence, coleoptile emergence, seedling weight, radicle length and coleoptile length is notable.The treatment with Azospirillum brasilense showed the best results, and no difference was observed with different pepper genotypes.

Despite the promising results obtained in the present study on the biostimulant effect of microorganisms on the in vitro germination of hybrid pepper seeds, some limitations that could have affected the results stand out. First, the sample used in this study was relatively small, which could limit the generalizability of the results to a broader population. Furthermore, the monitoring time was short, which does not allow us to evaluate the long-term impact of the microorganisms on the growth and development of pepper seedlings in subsequent phenological stages. Finally, although efforts were made to control the experimental conditions, environmental variables could have influenced the results and were not considered in this study.

Despite the limitations above, the results obtained in this study open new perspectives in the investigation of the biostimulant effect of microorganisms on the in vitro germination of hybrid pepper seeds. These findings could be used as a basis for future research, in which the sample size can be expanded, follow-up time prolonged, and other relevant environmental variables considered. Furthermore, additional studies could be conducted to determine the mechanisms underlying this biostimulant effect and explore the possibility of practically applying these microorganisms in large-scale pepper seedling production.

In summary, this study on the biostimulant effect of microorganisms on the in vitro germination of hybrid pepper seeds is promising. Despite the limitations above, a significant increase in the germination rate and vigor of the seedlings treated with the microorganisms was observed. These findings suggest that using microorganisms can effectively improve germination and initial development of pepper seedlings. However, more research is required to fully understand the mechanisms involved and evaluate the long-term impact on adult plant growth and performance.

Referencias

  1. Afzal, I., Javed, T., Amirkhani, M., & Taylor, A. G. (2020). Modern seed technology: Seed coating delivery systems for enhancing seed and crop performance.Agriculture,10(11), 526. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10110526
  2. Albarracin-Gomez, L. D., Hortua-Gamboa, S. D., & Acero-Godoy, J. (2023). Efecto inhibitorio del aceite esencial de Lippia graveolens sobre Fusarium oxysporum en la familia Solanaceae. Una revisión.Revista Tecnología en Marcha, 36(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v36i1.5877
  3. Arias, M. L., & Cano, C. I. M. (2009). Conservación de recursos genéticos de la agrobiodiversidad como apoyo al desarrollo de sistemas de producción sostenibles.Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria,10(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol10_num1_art:126
  4. Calero Hurtado, A., Pérez Díaz, Y., Quintero Rodríguez, E., Olivera Viciedo, D., & Peña Calzada, K. (2019). Efecto de la aplicación asociada entre Rhizobium leguminosarum y microorganismos eficientes sobre la producción del fríjol común.Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria,20(2), 295-322. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol20_num2_art:1460
  5. Camelo, M., Vera, S. P., & Bonilla, R. R. (2011). Mecanismos de acción de las rizobacterias promotoras del crecimiento vegetal.Ciencia & Tecnología Agropecuaria,12(2), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol12_num2_art:227
  6. Cano, M. A. (2011). Interacción de microorganismos benéficos en plantas: Micorrizas, Trichoderma spp. y Pseudomonas spp. Una revisión.Revista UDCA Actualidad & Divulgación Científica,14(2), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v14.n2.2011.771
  7. Cárdenas-Burgos, C. A., Araque-Barrera, J., Bohorquez-Quintero, M. D. L. Á., Hernández-Herrera, Y., & Pacheco-Maldonado, J. C. (2019). Propagación in vitro de Bucquetia glutinosa, especie endémica de los Paramos colombianos.Rodriguésia,70, e00682018. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860201970057
  8. Cervantes-Vázquez, M. G., Cano-Ríos, P., Nava-Camberos, U., Reyes-Carrillo, J. L., Galeote-Cid, G., & Ramírez-Ibarra, J. A. (2022). Comportamiento del chile Huacle (Capsicum annuum L.) con aplicación de compost y Azospirillum sp. en invernadero.Terra Latinoamericana,40, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v40i0.828
  9. Chávez-García, J. A., Aguilar-Carpio, C., Juárez-López, P., Escalante-Estrada, J. A. S., Rueda-Barrientos, M. C., & Tamayo-Aguilar, Y. (2023). Análisis de crecimiento de estragón (Artemisia dracunculus L.) en respuesta a Trichoderma harzianum y Glomus cubense.Bioagro,35(1), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.51372/bioagro351.9
  10. Criollo, P. J., Obando, M., Sánchez, L., & Bonilla, R. (2012). Efecto de bacterias promotoras de crecimiento vegetal (PGPR) asociadas a Pennisetum clandestinum en el altiplano cundiboyacense.Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria,13(2), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol13_num2_art:254
  11. Delgado, W. F. R., Aguilar, E. E. J., & Luna-Romero, Á. E. (2022). Evaluación morfológica del pimiento (Capsicum annun l.) bajo diferentes coberturas vegetales muertas, Ecuador.Revista Científica Agroecosistemas,10(3), 134-142.
  12. Domingues Duarte, C. F., Cecato, U., Trento Biserra, T., Mamédio, D., & Galbeiro, S. (2020). Azospirillum spp. en gramíneas y forrajeras. Revisión.Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias,11(1), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v11i1.4951
  13. Flores García, A., Álvarez Moctezuma, J. G., Rodríguez de la O, J. L., & Corona Ambris, A. (2008). Germinación in vitro de semillas de Nolina parviflora (H.B.K.) Hemsl. Foresta Veracruzana, 10(2), 27-33.
  14. Guerra, J. L. C., Ardisana, E. F. H., García, A. T., & Téllez, O. F. (2020). Respuestas del crecimiento y el rendimiento en pimiento (Capsicum annuum L.) híbrido Nathalie a un lixiviado de vermicompost bovino. La Técnica, 1-10.
  15. Hernández-Ruíz, G. M., Álvarez-Orozco, N. A., & Ríos-Osorio, L. A. (2017). Biorremediación de organofosforados por hongos y bacterias en suelos agrícolas: revisión sistemática. Cienc Tecnol Agropecuaria, 18(1), 139-159. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol18_num1_art:564
  16. IBM Corp. Released (2015). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. IBM Corp.
  17. Jarquín-Rosales, D., Valle, J. R. E. D., Alpuche-Osorno, J. J., Rodríguez-Ortiz, G., Campos-Ángeles, G. V., & Morales, I. (2023). Agave angustifolia bulbil growth in different substrates, with doses of fertigation and inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense.Ciência Rural,53(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20210863
  18. Kumar, A., Singh, S., Gaurav, A. K., Srivastava, S., & Verma, J. P. (2020). Plant growth-promoting bacteria: biological tools for the mitigation of salinity stress in plants.Frontiers in Microbiology,11, 1216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01216
  19. Liriano González, R., Pérez Ramos, J., Pérez Hernández, Y., Placeres Espinosa, I., Jardines González, S. B., & Rodríguez Jiménez, S. L. (2021). Use of effective microorganisms and FitoMas-E® to increase the growth and quality of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) seedlings.Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín,74(3), 9699-9706. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v74n3.90588
  20. Lobo, M. (2008). Importancia de los recursos genéticos de la agrobiodiversidad en el desarrollo de sistemas de producción sostenibles.Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria, 9(2), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol9_num2_art:114
  21. Mora, M. C., De Castro, I. A., & Pedraza, M. C. E. (2023). Evaluación de técnicas para el control biológico en cultivos agrícolas del municipio de Monterrey-Casanare, Colombia.Revista EIA,20(39), 3912.
  22. Palomino-Malpartida, J. R., Esquivel-Quispe, R., Huamancusi-Morales, J. L., Alarcón-Romani, S. M., & Blásquez-Morote, C. G. (2023). Azospirillum brasilense y ácido indol-3-butírico en el enraizamiento de tallos de palto (Persea americana Mill.).Bioagro,35(1), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.51372/bioagro351.8
  23. Pedraza, R. O., Teixeira, K. R., Scavino, A. F., de Salamone, I. G., Baca, B. E., Azcón, R., Baldani, V., & Bonilla, R. (2010). Microorganismos que mejoran el crecimiento de las plantas y la calidad de los suelos. Revisión.Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria,11(2), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol11_num2_art:206
  24. Pérez Moncada, U. A., Ramírez Gómez, M. M., Zapata Narváez, Y. A., & Córdoba Sánchez, J. M. (2015). Efecto de la inoculación simple y combinada con Hongos Formadores de Micorriza Arbuscular (HFMA) y Rizobacterias Promotoras de Crecimiento Vegetal (BPCV) en plántulas micropropagadas de mora (Rubus glaucus L.).Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria,16(1), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol16_num1_art:383
  25. Pérez-Velasco, E. A., Mendoza-Villarreal, R., Sandoval-Rangel, A., Cabrera-de la Fuente, M., Robledo-Torres, V., & Valdez-Aguilar, L. A. (2019). Evaluación del uso de endomicorrizas y Azospirillum sp. en la productividad y calidad nutracéutica de chile morrón (Capsicum annuum) en invernadero.Revista ITEA,115, 18-30. https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2018.029
  26. Pill, W. G., Collins, C. M., Goldberger, B., & Gregory, N. (2009). Responses of non-primed or primed seeds of ‘Marketmore 76’ cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) slurry coated with Trichoderma species to planting in growth media infested with Pythium aphanidermatum.Scientia horticulturae,121(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.01.004
  27. Piri, R., Moradi, A., Balouchi, H., & Salehi, A. (2019). Improvement of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) seed performance under drought stress by seed coating and biopriming.Scientia Horticulturae,257, 108667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108667
  28. Pozo, Y. R., Romero, L. C., Suárez, A. G., Pérez, J. G., & Álvarez-Rivera, V. P. (2006). Aislamiento, selección e identificación de bacterias del género Bacillus antagonistas de Pectobacterium carotovorum.Fitosanidad,10(3), 187-191.
  29. Quispe-Quispe, E., & Salas-Macías, C. (2022). La imbibición de semillas en solución con microorganismos eficientes mejora el desarrollo de plántulas de Daucus carota L.Manglar,19(3), 279-284. https://doi.org/10.17268/manglar.2022.035
  30. Quispe-Quispe, E., Moreira-Morrillo, A. A., & Garcés-Fiallos, F. R. (2022). Una revisión sobre biocontroladores de Phytophthora capsici y su impacto en plantas de Capsicum: Una perspectiva desde el exterior al interior de la planta.Scientia Agropecuaria,13(3), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2022.025
  31. Rangel-Lucio, J. A., Rodríguez-Mendoza, M. D. L. N., Ferrera-Cerrato, R., Castellanos-Ramos, J. Z., Ramírez-Gama, R. M., & Alvarado-Bárcenas, E. (2011). Afinidad y efecto de Azospirillum sp. en maíz.Agronomía Mesoamericana,22(2), 269-279. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v22i2.8689
  32. Restrepo-Correa, S. P., Pineda-Meneses, E. C., & Ríos-Osorio, L. A. (2017). Mecanismos de acción de hongos y bacterias empleados como biofertilizantes en suelos agrícolas: una revisión sistemática.Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria,18(2), 335-351. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol18_num2_art:635
  33. Reyes, I., Alvarez, L., El-Ayoubi, H., & Valery, A. (2008). Selección y evaluación de rizobacterias promotoras del crecimiento en pimentón y maíz.Bioagro,20(1), 37-48.
  34. Rocha, I., Ma, Y., Souza-Alonso, P., Vosátka, M., Freitas, H., & Oliveira, R. S. (2019). Seed coating: a tool for delivering beneficial microbes to agricultural crops.Frontiers in plant science,10, 1357. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01357
  35. Romero-García, V. E., García-Ortiz, V. R., Hernández-Escareño, J. J., & Sánchez-Yáñez, J. M. (2016). Respuesta de Phaseolus vulgaris a microorganismos promotores de crecimiento vegetal.Scientia Agropecuaria, 7(3), 313-319. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2016.03.20
  36. Salgado-Escobar, I., Hernández-Rodríguez, G., Suárez-López, Y. D. C., Mancera-Ugarte, M. J., & Guerra-Ramírez, D. (2020). Eficacia de métodos de desinfección y los efectos sobre las propiedades nutracéuticas en cilantro y fresa.Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas,11(2), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v11i2.1892
  37. Stewart, A., & Hill, R. (2014). Applications of Trichoderma in plant growth promotion. Biotechnology and Biology of Trichoderma 31, 415-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59576-8.00031-X
  38. Torres Pérez, J. C., Aguilar Jiménez, C. E., Vázquez Solís, H., Solís López, M., Gómez Padilla, E., & Aguilar Jiménez, J. R. (2022). Evaluación del uso de microorganismos de montaña activados en el cultivo de rosas, Zinacantán, Chiapas, México.Siembra, 9(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.29166/siembra.v9i1.3500
  39. Uribe, M. E., Delaveau, C., Garcés, M., & Escobar, R. (2008). Efecto de asepsia y fitohormonas en el establecimiento in vitro de Berberidopsis corallina, a partir de segmentos nodales.Bosque (Valdivia),29(1), 58-64. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002008000100007
  40. Vásconez, R. D. A., Mossot, J. E. M., Shagñay, A. G. O., Tenorio, E. M., Utreras, V. P. C., & Suquillo, I. D. L. Á. V. (2020). Evaluación de Bacillus spp. como rizobacterias promotoras del crecimiento vegetal (RPCV) en brócoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) y lechuga (Lactuca sativa).Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria,21(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol21_num3_art:1465
  41. Vassilev, N., Vassileva, M., Martos, V., Garcia del Moral, L. F., Kowalska, J., Tylkowski, B., & Malusá, E. (2020). Formulation of microbial inoculants by encapsulation in natural polysaccharides: focus on beneficial properties of carrier additives and derivatives.Frontiers in Plant Science,11, 270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00270