Ir al contenido principal Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
RC&TA
ISSN:0122-8706 E-ISSN: 2500-5308 DOI: 10.21930
10.21930/rcta.vol11_num1_art:196
Enviado: 2010-06-30
Publicado: 2010-06-30

Evaluación de respuestas fisiológicas de la planta arbórea Hibiscus rosasinensis L, (Cayeno) en condiciones de campo y vivero

Universidad de Cundinamarca, Fusagasugá
Afiliación
×

Nestor Dario Cuéllar

Trabajo de grado. Programa: Ingeniería Agronómica, 2009.
Universidad de Cundinamarca, Fusagasugá.
Afiliación
×

Juan Manuel Arrieta Herrera

Docente TCO. Programa: Ingeniería Agronómica.

Cómo citar

Evaluación de respuestas fisiológicas de la planta arbórea Hibiscus rosasinensis L, (Cayeno) en condiciones de campo y vivero. (2010). Ciencia Y Tecnología Agropecuaria, 11(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol11_num1_art:196

Resumen

Con la finalidad de conocer y entender las características fisiológicas y productivas de especies forrajeras con una alta potencialidad para ser involucradas dentro de los sistemas silvo-pastoriles, se llevó a cabo el presente estudio sobre Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. Las plantas se ubicaron bajo condiciones de vivero (17°C) y siembra directa en campo (22°C), en la estación experimental La Esperanza, localizada en el municipio de Fusagasugá (Cundinamarca, Colombia) a 4°16´34´´ N y 23´11´´ W, 1750 msnm, 20°C de temperatura promedio, 1200 mm./año, el 81% de humedad relativa y 1387 horas de luz/año. Los muestreos se realizaron cada ocho (8) días y se evaluaron los estados de crecimiento y desarrollo de la especie forrajera Hibiscus y el modelo de distribución radicular. Cuando la planta de Hibiscus rosa-sinensis se desarrolla bajo condiciones de vivero se genera un modelo de raíz gravitrópico, fuerte, con dos raíces principales pivotantes, con abundantes y extensas raíces laterales primarias y secundarias (Modelo Tsutsumi et al, 2003); por el contrario, en campo el modelo predice que las plantas desarrollan un modelo radicular plagio-gravitrópico superficial; a los 105 días la relación raíz:brote (R:B) es muy deficiente (0,16), frente a las de vivero (0,25). Las dos (2) raíces principales y las laterales primarias y secundarias no son muy abundantes. Hasta los 105 días después de la siembra, las plantas bajo las condiciones de vivero son superiores a las establecidas en siembra directa en su índice de área foliar (IAF), área foliar efectiva (AFE), tasa de asimilación neta (TAN) y, por consiguiente, en su tasa de crecimiento relativo (TCR); a partir de este tiempo, las plantas en campo comienzan una fase de crecimiento exponencial, como lo mostró la TCR y la TAN. La especie Hibiscus rosa-sinensis necesariamente requiere una fase de vivero de hasta los 98 o 105 días. El sistema de raíz desarrollado por la planta permite conocer que la fertilización temprana no sería viable y que ésta se puede realizar a partir de los 60 días después del transplante, cuando el desarrollo alométrico de la planta es equilibrado. Las tasas e índices fisiológicos (TAN, RAF, AFE, IAF, TCR) nos permiten proponer la especie Hibiscus rosa-sinensis como una planta óptima para los sistemas de silvopastoreo y planificar las labores culturales y agronómicas como especie forrajera.

 

 

1837 1380
  • Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
  • Silvopastoreo
  • Agroforestería
  • Forrajes
  • Tasa de crecimiento relativo

Nestor Dario Cuéllar, Universidad de Cundinamarca, Fusagasugá

Trabajo de grado. Programa: Ingeniería Agronómica, 2009.

Juan Manuel Arrieta Herrera, Universidad de Cundinamarca, Fusagasugá.

Docente TCO. Programa: Ingeniería Agronómica.
  1. Antúnez, I.; Retamosa, E.C.; Villar, R. (2001). Relative Growth Rate in Phylogenetically Related Deciduous and Evergreen Woody Species. Oecologia 128: 172-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100645
  3. Altieri, M.A. (1997). Agroecología: bases científicas para una agricultura sustentables. Clades. La Habana, Cuba. 249 p.
  5. Amaro, J.A.; García, E.; Henríquez, J.F. (2004). Análisis del crecimiento, área foliar especifica y concentración de nitrógeno en hojas del pasto "mulato" (Brachiaria hibrido, cv.). Tecnología Pecuaria Mexicana 42 (3): 447-458.
  7. Amato, M.; Ritchie, J.T. (2002). Spatial Distribution of Roots and Water Uptake of Maize (Zea mays L.) as Affected by Soil Structure. Crop Sci. 42: 773-780. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.7730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.7730
  9. Andrade, F.; Uhart, S.A. y Frugone, M.I. (1993). Intercepted Radiation at Flowering and Kernel Number in Maize: Shade vs. Plant Density Effects. Crop Science, 33: 482-485. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300030013x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300030013x
  11. Andrews, M.; Raven, J.A.; Sprent, J.I. (2001). Environmental Effects on Dry Matter Partitioning Between Shoot and Root of Crop Plants: Relations with Growth and Shoot Protein Concentration. Annals of Applied Biology 138: 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00085.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00085.x
  13. Azofeifa, A.; Moreira, M. (1998). Análisis del crecimiento del chile dulce (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivar UCR 589 en Alajuela, Costa Rica. Boletín Técnico Estación Experimental Fabio Baudrit M. 31(1): 1-12.
  15. Badger, M.R.; Bjorkman, O.; Armond, P.A. (1982). An Analysis Ofphotosynthetic Response and Adaptation to Temperature in Higher Plants: Temperature Acclimation in the Desert Evergreen Nerium Oleander L. Plant Cell and Environment 5: 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1982.tb00142.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-3040.ep11587620
  17. Barraza, F.; Fischer, G.; Cardona, C.E. (2004). Estudio del proceso de crecimiento del cultivo del tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) en el Valle del Sinú medio, Colombia. Agronomía Colombiana, 22 (1): 81-90.
  19. Beer, J.; Muschler, R.; Kass, D.; Somarriba, E. (1998). Shade Management Coffee and Cacao Plantations. Agroforestry Systems 38: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9008-2_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9008-2_6
  21. Berry, J.; Bjorkman, O. (1980). Photosynthetic Response and Adaptation to Temperature in Higher Plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31: 491-543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.002423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.002423
  23. Bloom, A.J.; Meyerhoff, P.A.; Taylor, A.R.; Rost, T.L. (2002). Root Development and Absorption of Ammonium and Nitrate From the Rhizosphere. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 21: 416-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-003-0009-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-003-0009-8
  25. Bolio, R.E.; Lara, P.E.; Magaña, M.A. (2006). Producción forrajera del tulipán (Hibiscus rosa-sinensis) según intervalo de corte y densidad de siembra. Tec. Pecu. Mex 44(3): 379-388.
  27. Brooks, T.J.; Wall, G.W.; Pinter, P.J. Jr.; Kimball, B.A.; La Morte, R.L.; Leavitt, S.W. (2000). Acclimation Response of Spring Wheat in a Free-air CO2 Enrichment (Face) Atmosphere with Variable Soil Nitrogen Regimes. Canopy Architecture and Gas Exchange, Photosynthesis Research 66: 97-108.
  29. Campbell, C.S.; Heilman, J.L.; McInnes, K.J.; Wilson, L.T.; Medley, J.C.; Wu, G.; Cobos, D.R. (2001). Seasonal Variation in Radiation Use Eficiency of Irrigated Rice. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 110: 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00277-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00277-5
  31. Canham, C.D.; Kobe, R.K.; Latty, E.F.; Chazdon, R.L. (1999). Interspecific and Intraspecific Variation in Tree Seedling Survival: Effects of Allocation to Roots Versus Carbohydrate Reserves. Oecologia 121: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050900
  33. Castro-Díez, P.; Puyravaud, J.P.; Cornelissen, J.H. (2000). Leaf Structure and Anatomy as Related to Leaf Mass per Area Variation in Seedling of a Wide Range of Woody Plant Species and Types. Oecologia 124: 476-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008873
  35. Cock, J.H.; El-Sharkawy, M.A. (1988). Physiological Characteristics for Cassava Selection. Experimental Agriculture 24(4): 443-448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700100183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700100183
  37. Cornelissen, J.H.; Castro-Diez, P.; Hunt, R. (1996). Seedling Growth, Allocation and Leaf Attributes in a Wide Range of Woody Plant Species and Types. Journal of Ecology 84: 755-765. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2261337
  39. Cowling, S.A.; Field, C.B. (2003). Environmental Control of Leaf Area Production: Implications for Vegetation and Land-surface Modeling. Global Biogeochemical CycIes 17: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001915 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001915
  41. Currie, H.; Perry, C. (2007). Silica in Plants: Biological, Biochemical and Chemical Studies. Annals of Botany 100: 1383-1389. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm247
  43. Del Pozo, P.P.; Jérez, I.; Mesa, B.; Padilla, P.; Ginoria, J. (1999). Comportamiento productivo de un agroecosistema silvopastoril asociado con Leucaena leucocephala y Cynodon nlemfuensis. En: Primer Congreso Latino Americano de Agroforestería para la Producción Animal Sostenible. Fundación Cipav, Cali, Colombia. 47 p.
  45. Drake, B.G.; González-Meler, M.A.; Long, S.P. (1997). More Eficient Plants: a Consequence of Rising Atmospheric C02? Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48: 609-639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.609
  47. Dubrovsky, J.; Gambetta, G.A.; Hernández-Barrera, A.; Shishkova, S.; González, L. (2006). Lateral Root Initiation in Arabidopsis: Developmental Window, Spatial Patteming, Density and Predictability. Annals of Botany 97: 903-915. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcj604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcj604
  49. Ewert, F.; Pleijel, H. (1999). Phenological Development, Leaf Emergence, Tillering and Leaf Area Index, and Duration of Spring Wheat Across Europe in Response to CO2 and Ozone. European Journal of Agronomy 10: 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00008-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00008-8
  51. Farquhar, G.D.; von Caemmerer, S.; Berry, J.A. (1980). A Biochemical Model of Photosynthetic C02 Assimilation in Leaves ofC3 Plants. Planta 149: 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386231
  53. Ferrar, P.J.; Slatyer, R.O.; Vranjic, J.A. (1989). Photosynthetic Temperature Acclimation in Eucalyptus Species From Diverse Habitats and a Comparison with Nerium Oleander. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 16: 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9890199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9890199
  55. Forde, B.G.; Lorenzo, H. (2001). The Nutritional Control of Root Development. Plant and Soil 232: 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010329902165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010329902165
  57. Forde, B.G. (2002). Local and Long-range Signaling Pathways Regulating Plant Responses to Nitrate. Annual Review of Plant Biology 53: 203-204. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135256
  59. Gardner, F.P.; Pearce, R.B.; Mitchell, R.L. (1990). Physiology of Crop Plants. Second edition. Iowa State Press, Ames. 327 p.
  61. Gardner, B.R.; Pearce, R.B. y Michell, R.L. (1985). Physiology of Crops Plants. Iowa State University Press. USA. S.P.
  63. Garnier, E. (1992). Growth Analysis of Congeneric Annual and Perennial Grass Species. Journal of Ecology 80: 665-675. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260858 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2260858
  65. Garnier, E.; Laurent, G. (1994). Leaf Anatomy, Specific Mass and Water Content in Congeneric Annual and Perennial Grass Species. New Phytologist 128: 725-736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04036.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04036.x
  67. Gil, A.I. y Miranda, D. (2007). Efecto de cinco sustratos sobre índices de crecimiento de plantas de papaya (Carica papaya L.) bajo invernadero. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas. Vol. 1. N° 2: 142-153. https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2007v1i2.1156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2007v1i2.1156
  69. Gómez, M.H.; Murgueito, E.; Molina, C.H. (1995). Matarratón (Gliricidia sepium) En: Árboles y arbustos forrajeros utilizados en la alimentación animal como fuente proteica. Centro para la investigación de sistemas sostenibles de producción. Cali, Colombia, 13 p.
  71. Gray, W.M.; Muskett, P.R.; Chuang, H.W.; Parker, J.E. (2003). Arabidopsis SGTlb is Required for ScftirlMediated Auxin Response. Plant Cell 15: 1310-1319. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010884
  73. Hartz-Rubin, J.S.; De Lucia, E.H. (2001). Canopy Development of a Mode Herbaceous Community Exposed to Elevated Atmospheric CO2 and Soil Nutrients. Physiologia Plantarum 113: 258-266. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1130214.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1130214.x
  75. Hikosaka, K.; Murakami, A.; Hirose, T. (1999). Balancing Carboxylation and Regeneration Ofribulose-l,5Bisphosphate in Leaf Photosynthesis in Temperature Acclimation of an Evergreen Tree, Quercus myrsinaefolia. Plant Cell and Environment 22: 841-849. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00442.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00442.x
  77. Hikosaka, K.; Ishikawa, K.; Borjigidai, A.; Muller, O.; Onoda, Y. (2006). Temperature Acclimation of Photosynthesis: Mechanisms Involved in the Changes in Temperature Dependence of Photosynthetic Rate. Journal of Experimental Botany. Vol. 57. N° 2: 291-302. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj049
  79. Hirose, T.; Ackerly, D.D.; Traw, M.B.; Ramseier, D.; Bazzaz, F.A. (1997). CO2 Elevation, Canopy Photosynthesis, and Optimalleaf Area Index. Ecology 78: 2339-2350. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2339:CECPAL]2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2339:CECPAL]2.0.CO;2
  81. Hunt, R.; Causton, D.R.; Shipley, B.; Askew, A.P. (2002). A Modern Tool for Classical Growth Analysis. Annals of Botany 90: 485-488. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf214
  83. Jarvis, P.; Leverenz, J.W. (1983). Productivity Oftemperate, Deciduous and Evergreen Forests. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68156-1_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68156-1_9
  85. Kimball, B.A.; Kobayashi, K.; Bindi, M. (2002). Responses of Agricultural Crops to Free-air C02 Enrichment. Advances in Agronomy 77: 293±368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(02)77017-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(02)77017-X
  87. Korner, C. (1991) Some Often Overlooked Plant Characteristics as Determinants of Plant Growth: a Considerations. Funct Ecol (5): 162-173. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2389254
  89. Kozlowski, T.; Kramer, P.; Pallarady, S. (1991). The Physiological Ecology of Woody Plants. Academic Press. New York. S.P. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/8.2.213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/8.2.213
  91. Kruse, J.; Hetzger, L.; Hansch, R.; Mendel, R.R.; Walch-Liu, P.; Engels, C. (2002). Elevated C02 Favours Nitrate Reduction in the Roots of Wildtype Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv. Gat.) and Significantly Alters N-metabolism in Transformants Lacking Functional Nitrate Reductase in the Roots. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 2351-2367. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erf094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erf094
  93. Lambers, H.; Poorter, H. (1992). Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences. Advances in Ecological Research 23: 187-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60148-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60148-8
  95. Larcher, W. (2005). Physiological Plant Ecology. Pringer-Verlag. S.P.
  97. Lemus, L.H.; Lemus, V.E. (2004). Plantas de uso forrajero en el trópico cálido y templado de Colombia. Tercera edición, Unillanos: 344-346.
  99. Lusk, C.H.; Contreras, O.; Figueroa, J. (1997). Growth, Biomass Allocation and Plant Nitrogen Concentration in Chilean Temperate Rainforest Tree Seedlings: Effects of Nutrient Availability. Oecologia 109: 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050057
  101. Makino, A.; Nakano, H.; Mae, T. (1994). Effects of Growth Temperature on the Responses of Ribulose-l,5Bisphosphate Carboxyase, Electron Transport Components, and Sucrose Synthesis Enzymes to Leaf Nitrogen in Rice, and Their Relationships to Photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 105: 1231-1238. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.4.1231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.4.1231
  103. Marañón, T.; Grubb, P.J. (1993). Physiological Basis and Ecological Significance of the Seed Size and Relative Growth Rate Relationship in Mediterranean Annuals. Functional Ecology 7: 591-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2390136
  105. Monteith, J.L. 1977. Climate and the Efficiency of Crop Production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 281: 277-294. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1977.0140
  107. Murchie, E.H.; Hubbart, S.; Chen, Y.; Peng, S.; Horton, P. (2002). Acclimation of Rice Photosynthesis to Irradiance under Field Conditions. Plant Physiology Vol. 130: 1999-2010. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.011098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.011098
  109. Nygren, P.; Kiema, P.; Rebottaro, A. (1996). Canopy Development, CO2 Exchange and Carbon Balance of a Modeled Agroforestry Tree. Tree Physiology 16: 733. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/16.9.733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/16.9.733
  111. Pereira, J.S. (1994). Gas Exchange and Growth. In: Schulze, E.D.; Caldwell, M.M. (editors). Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Alemania: 147-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79354-7_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79354-7_8
  113. Poorter, H. (1989a). Growth Analysis: Towards a Synthesis of the Classical and the Functional Approach. Physiologic Plantarum 75: 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1989.tb06175.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1989.tb06175.x
  115. Poorter, H. (1989b). Interspecific Variation in Relative Growth Rate: On Ecological Causes and Physiological Consequences. In: Lambers, H.; Cambridge, M.L.; Konings, H.: 45-68.
  117. Poorter, H.; Remkes, C.; Lambers, H. (1990). Carbon and Nitrogen Economy of 24 Wild Species Differing in Relative Growth Rate. Plant Physiology 94: 621-627. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.2.621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.2.621
  119. Porter, H. (2002). Environrnental Sensing and Directional Growth of Plant Roots. In: Waisel, Y.; Eshel, A.; Kafkafi, U: eds. Plant Roots: the Hidden Half. New York: Marcel Dekker: 471-487. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203909423.ch29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203909423.ch29
  121. Raven, J.A.; Andrews, M.; Quigg, A. (2005). The Evolution of Oligotrophy: Implications for the Breeding of Crop Plants for Low Input Agricultural Systems. Annals of Applied Biology 146: 261-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.040138.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.040138.x
  123. Reich, P.B.; Walters, M.E.; ElIsworth, D.S.; Uhi, C. (1994). Photosynthesisnitrogen Relations in Amazonian Tree Species: 1. Pattems Among Species and Communities. Oecologia 97: 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317909
  125. Rochette, P.; Desjardins, R.L.; Pattey, E.; Lessard, R. (1995). Crop Net Carbon Dioxide Exchange Rate and Radiation Use Efficiency in Soybean. Agronomy Journal 87: 22-28. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700010005x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700010005x
  127. Rochette, P.; Desjardins, R.L.; Pattey, E.; Lessard, R. (1996). Instantaneous Measurement of Radiation and Water Use Efficiencies of a Maize Crop. Agronomy Journal 88: 627-635. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800040022x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800040022x
  129. Rodriguez, D.; Ewert, F.; Goudriaan, J.; Manderscheid, R.; Burkart, S.; Weigel, H.J. (2001). Modeling the Response of Wheat Canopy Assimilation to Atmospheric C02 Concentrations. New Phytologist 150: 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00106.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00106.x
  131. Reffye, P.; Heuvelink, E.; Barthelemy, D. (2008). Plant Growth Models. Encyclopedia of Ecology. 2837 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00217-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00217-2
  133. Scheible, W.R.; Morcuende, R.; Czechowski, T.; Fritz, C.; Osuna, D.; Palacios-Rojas, N. (2004). Genome-wide Reprogramming of Primary and Secondary Metabolism, Protein Synthesis, Cellular Growth Processes, and the Regulatory Infrastructure of Arabidopsis in Response to Nitrogen. Plant Physiology 136: 2483-2499. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.047019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.047019
  135. Shibles, R. (1987). Crop Physiology. Iowa, USA, Iowa State University. 214 p.
  137. Shipley, B. (2002). Trade-offs Between Net Assimilation Rate and Specific Leaf Area in Determining Relative Growth Rate: Relationship with Daily Irradiance. Functional Ecology 16: 682-689. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00672.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00672.x
  139. Schulze, E.D.; Caldwell, M.M. (1995). Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis. Editorial Springer. 576 p. New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79354-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79354-7
  141. Stitt, M.; Scheible, W.R. (1999). Nitrate Acts as a Signal to Control Gene Expression, Metabolism and Biomass Allocation. In: Kruger, N.; Hill, S.A.; Ratcliffe, R.G. eds. Regulation of Metabolism Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic Publisher: 275-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4818-4_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4818-4_14
  143. Tardieu, F. (1987). Etat Structural, Enracinement et Alimentation Hydrique du Mais. II. Disponibilité des Reseves en Eau du Sol. Agronomie 7(4): 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19870407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19870407
  145. Tardieu, F. (1988b). Analysis of the Spatial Variability in Maize Root Density. Effect of a Wheel Compaction on Water Extraction. Plant Soil. V. 109: 257-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02202092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02202092
  147. Tardieu, F.; Manichon, F. (1986). Caractérisation en Tant que Capteur d'eau de l'enracinement du Mais en Parcelle Cultivée. Discussion des Critères d'etude. Agronomie 6(4): 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19860404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19860404
  149. Tardieu, F.; Bruckler, L.; Lafolie, F. (1992). Root Clumping May Affect the Root Water Potential and the Resistance to Soil-root Water Transport. Plant Soil 140: 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010606
  151. Tsutsumi, D.; Kosugi, K.; Mizuyama, T. (2003). Root-System Development and Water-Extraction Model Considering Hydrotropism Soil. Sci. Am. J. 67: 387-401. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.3870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.3870
  153. Veneklaas, E.J.; Poorter, L. (1998). Growth and Carbon Partitioning of Tropical Tree Seedlings in Contrasting Light Environments. In: Lambers, H.; Poorter, H.; van Vuuren, I. (editors). Inherent Variation in Plant Growth. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, Países Bajos: 337-361.
  155. Villar, R.; Marañón, T.; Quero, J.L.; Panadero, P.; Arenas, F.; Lambers, M. (2004) Variation in Growth Rate of 20 Aegilops Species (Poaceae) in the Field: The Importance of Net Assimilation Rate or Specific Leag Rea Depends or the Time Scale. Plant and Soil 8: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-3846-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-3846-8
  157. Wright, I.J.; Westoby, M. (2000). Cross-species Relationships Between Seedling Relative Growth Rate, Nitrogen Productivity and Root vs. Leaf Function in 28 Australian Woody Species. Functional Ecology 14: 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00393.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00393.x
  159. Yamasaki, T.; Yamakawa, T.; Yamane, Y.; Koike, H.; Satoh, K.; Katoh, S. (2002). Temperature Acclimation of Photosynthesis and Related Changes in Photosystem II Electron Transport in Winter Wheat. Plant Physiology 128: 1087-1097. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010919
Evaluación de respuestas fisiológicas de la planta arbórea Hibiscus rosasinensis L, (Cayeno) en condiciones de campo y vivero. (2010). Ciencia Y Tecnología Agropecuaria, 11(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol11_num1_art:196
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Metricas

1838 | 1382




 

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

logo co

Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA

Dirección: Km 14 Vía Mosquera - Bogotá
Código Postal: 250047
Horario de Atención: Lunes a Viernes 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m

Contacto

Teléfono Conmutador: (+57 60 1) 4227300
Línea Gratuita: 01 8000 121515
Correo Institucional: atencionalcliente@agrosavia.co
Correo de notificaciones judiciales:
notificacionesjudiciales@agrosavia.co
Línea de atención de denuncias:
somosintegros@agrosavia.co
Política de seguridad de la información

logo co