Ir al contenido principal Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
RC&TA
ISSN:0122-8706 E-ISSN: 2500-5308 DOI: 10.21930
10.21930/rcta.vol23_num3_art:2674
Enviado: 2021-08-19
Publicado: 2022-12-09

Agricultura de conservación como estrategia potencial para incrementar la calidad del suelo en agroecosistemas de Colombia

Universidad Central
Universidad Central
Universidad Central

Cómo citar

Agricultura de conservación como estrategia potencial para incrementar la calidad del suelo en agroecosistemas de Colombia . (2022). Ciencia Y Tecnología Agropecuaria, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol23_num3_art:2674

Resumen

La agricultura de conservación (AC) se ha promovido en América Latina como una alternativa para la gestión sostenible del suelo debido a su capacidad para prevenir la degradación edáfica, mejorar la productividad de los cultivos, minimizar el impacto del cambio climático y contribuir a la protección de la biodiversidad edáfica. El objetivo de la investigación fue evaluar el efecto de la AC sobre la calidad del suelo (CS) en cinco agroecosistemas del municipio de Cachipay (Cundinamarca): una cronosecuencia de cultivos de café (CC) de (1) 5 (CC5) y (2) 10 (CC10) años de establecimiento, sistemas de policultivos (SPC) de (3) 1 (SPC1) y (4) 6 (SPC6) años de edad, y (5) un agroecosistema en descanso (F, del inglés Fallow). Para lo cual, se determinó un conjunto mínimo de datos (MDS, del inglés Minimum Data Sets) a partir de un análisis de componentes principales. El índice de estabilidad de agregados, la estabilidad de agregados, la humedad, el diámetro medio geométrico, la conductividad eléctrica, la densidad de heterótrofos totales y las catalasas se seleccionaron en el MDS. Los mayores valores del índice de calidad se obtuvieron en: CC5 (0,71), CC10 (0,67), SPC6 (0,66), SPC1 (0,65) vs. F (0,60). El estudio evidenció el efecto positivo de las prácticas de AC basadas en una mínima alteración del suelo, una menor dependencia de los agroquímicos, una cobertura orgánica permanente y los sistemas agrícolas diversificados sobre la CS. El enfoque MDS-SQI representa una herramienta práctica, prometedora y adecuada para hacer seguimiento de la CS en agroecosistemas.

 

1529 949
  • conjunto total de datos
  • conjunto mínimo de datos
  • conservación
  • indicadores
  • índice de calidad de suelos
  • ordenación de tierras sostenible
  1. Abd-Elwahed, M. S. (2019). Effect of long-term wastewater irrigation on the quality of alluvial soil for agricultural sustainability. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 64(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2019.10.003
  2. Andrades, M., Moliner, A., & Masaguer, A. (2015). Prácticas de edafología: Métodos didácticos para análisis de suelos. Universidad de Rioja. https://publicaciones.unirioja.es/catalogo/monografias/mdaa15.shtml
  3. Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Cambardella, C. A. (2004). The soil management assessment framework: a quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68, 1945-1962. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.1945
  4. Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Mitchell, J. P. (2002). A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 90(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00174-8
  5. Askari, M. S., & Holden, N. M. (2015). Quantitative soil quality indexing of temperate arable management systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 150, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STILL.2015.01.010
  6. Basche, A. D., Kaspar, T. C., Archontoulis, S. V., Jaynes, D. B., Sauer, T. J., Parkin, T. B., & Miguez, F. E. (2016). Soil water improvements with the long-term use of a winter rye cover crop. Agricultural Water Management, 172, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.006
  7. Choudhary, M., Datta, A., Jat, H. S., Yadav, A. K., Gathala, M. K., Sapkota, T. B., & Ladha, J. K. (2018). Changes in soil biology under conservation agriculture based sustainable intensification of cereal systems in Indo-Gangetic Plains. Geoderma, 313, 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.041
  8. Cubillos, A. M., Vallejo, V. E., Arbeli, Z., Ter, W., Dick, R. P., Molina, C. H., & Roldan, F. (2016). Effect of the conversion of conventional pasture to intensive silvopastoral systems on edaphic bacterial and ammonia oxidizer communities in Colombia. European Journal of Soil Biology Journal, 72, 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.12.003
  9. Das, S., Bhattacharyya, R., Das, T. K., Sharma, A. R., Dwivedi, B. S., Meena, M. C., Dey, A., Biswas, S., Aditya, K., Aggarwal, P., Biswas A. K., & Chaudhari, S. K. (2021). Soil quality indices in a conservation agriculture-based rice-mustard cropping system in North-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil and Tillage Research, 208, 104914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104914
  10. Diniz, L. T., Ramos, M. L. G., Junior, W. Q. R., Cruz, A. F., De Franca, L. V., Diniz, B. T., & Amabile, R. F. (2016). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on soil microbial biomass in an Oxisol cultivated with irrigated barley in the Brazilian Cerrado. Acta agronómica, 65(2), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v65n2.46432
  11. Dubey, R. K., Dubey, P. K., & Abhilash, P. C. (2019). Sustainable soil amendments for improving the soil quality, yield and nutrient content of Brassica juncea (L.) grown in different agroecological zones of eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Soil and Tillage Research, 195, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104418
  12. EPA. (2004). Method 9045D. Soil and waste pH.
  13. FAO. (2014). Agricultura de conservación. http://www.fao.org/conservation-agriculture/es/
  14. FAO. (2015). Soil is a non-renewable resource.
  15. FAO & ITPS. (2015). Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR) - Main Report.
  16. Fernández, L., Rojas, N., Roldán, T., Carrillo, M., Ramírez, M., Zegarra, H., Hernández, R., Reyes, R., Flores, D., & Arce, D. (2006). Manual de técnicas de análisis de suelos aplicadas a la remediación de sitios contaminados. Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Instituto Nacional de Ecología.
  17. Guo, L., Sun, Z., Ouyang, Z., Han, D., & Li, F. (2017). A comparison of soil quality evaluation methods for Fluvisol along the lower Yellow River. Catena, 152, 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.01.015
  18. Gura, I., & Mnkeni, P. N. S. (2019). Crop rotation and residue management effects under no till on the soil quality of a Haplic Cambisol in Alice, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Geoderma, 337, 927-934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.10.042
  19. Gura, I., Mnkeni, P., Du Preez, C., & Barnard, J. (2022). Short-term effects of conservation agriculture strategies on the soil quality of a Haplic Plinthosol in Eastern Cape, South Africa. Soil and Tillage Research, 220 (July 2021), 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2022.105378
  20. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: paleontological statistic software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontological association. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 9. https://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm
  21. Hong, Y., Heerink, N., Zhao, M., & van der Werf, W. (2019). Intercropping contributes to a higher technical efficiency in smallholder farming: Evidence from a case study in Gaotai County, China. Agricultural Systems, 173, 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.007
  22. IGAC. (1990). Métodos analíticos del laboratorio de suelos.
  23. IGAC. (2014). Códigos para los levantamientos de suelos. http://igacnet2.igac.gov.co/intranet/UserFiles/File/procedimientos/instructivos/I40100-06-14.V1Codigos para los levantamientos de suelos.pdf
  24. Johnson, J., & Temple, K. (1964). Some variable affecting the measurement of “catalase activity” in soil. Soil Science Society of America, 28, 207-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1959-5
  25. Karlen, D. L., & Stott, D. E. (1994). A framework for evaluating physical and chemical indicators of soil quality. In J. W. Doran, D. C. Leman, D. F. Bezdicek, & B. A. Stewart (Eds.), Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment; Proceedings of a symposium, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1992 (pp. 53-72). Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub35.c4
  26. Kongor, J. E., Boeckx, P., Vermeir, P., Van de Walle, D., Baert, G., Afoakwa, E. O., & Dewettinck, K. (2019). Assessment of soil fertility and quality for improved cocoa production in six cocoa growing regions in Ghana. Agroforestry Systems, 93(4), 1455-1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0253-3
  27. Leite Chaves, H. M., Concha Lozada, C. M., & Gaspar, R. O. (2017). Soil quality index of an Oxisol under different land uses in the Brazilian savannah. Geoderma Regional, 10, 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2017.07.007
  28. Lerner, A. M., Zuluaga, A. F., Chará, J., Andrés E., & Searchinger, T. (2017). Sustainable cattle ranching in practice: Moving from theory to planning in Colombia’s Livestock Sector. Environmental Management, 60(2), 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0902-8
  29. Li, P., Shi, K., Wang, Y., Kong, D., Liu, T., Jiao, J., Manqiang, L., Huixin, L., & Hu, F. (2019). Soil quality assessment of wheat-maize cropping system with different productivities in China: Establishing a minimum data set. Soil and Tillage Research, 190, 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.02.019
  30. Liebig, M. A., Varvel, G. E., & Doran, J. W. (2001). A simple performance-based index for assessing multiple agroecosystem functions. Agronomy & Horticulture, 93(2), 313-318. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.932313x
  31. Morugán-Coronado, A., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Insolia, E., Soto-Gómez, D., Fernández-Calviño, D., & Zornoza, R. (2022). The impact of crop diversification, tillage and fertilization type on soil total microbial, fungal and bacterial abundance: A worldwide meta-analysis of agricultural sites. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 329, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.107867
  32. Nabiollahi, K., Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Kerry, R., & Moradian, S. (2017). Assessment of soil quality indices for salt-affected agricultural land in Kurdistan Province, Iran. Ecological Indicators, 83, 482-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.001
  33. Nehrani, S. H., Sadegh Askari, M., Saadat, S., Amir Delavar, M., Taheri, M., & Holden, N. M. (2020). Quantification of soil quality under semi-arid agriculture in the Northwest of Iran. Ecological Indicators, 108, 105770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105770
  34. Nimmo, J. R., & Perkins, K. S. (2002). Aggregate stability and size distribution. In J. H. Dane & G. C. Topp (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 4 physical methods (pp. 317-328). Soil Science Society of America, Inc. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c14
  35. Onet, A., Dincă, L. C., Grenni, P., Laslo, V., Teusdea, A. C., Vasile, D. L., & Crisan, V. E. (2019). Biological indicators for evaluating soil quality improvement in a soil degraded by erosion processes. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 19(5), 2393-2404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-02236-9
  36. Page, K. L., Dang, Y. P., & Dalal, R. C. (2020). The ability of conservation agriculture to conserve soil organic carbon and the subsequent impact on soil physical, chemical, and biological properties and yield. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00031
  37. Parihar, C. M., Singh, A. K., Jat, S. L., Dey, A., Nayak, H. S., Mandal, B. N., & Yadav, O. P. (2020). Soil quality and carbon sequestration under conservation agriculture with balanced nutrition in intensive cereal-based system. Soil and Tillage Research, 202, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104653
  38. Parra-González, S., & Rodriguez-Valenzuela, J. (2017). Determination of the soil quality index by principal component analysis in cocoa agroforestry system in the Orinoco region, Colombia. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International, 10(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/jaeri/2017/31346
  39. Qi Y., Darilek, J. L., Huang, B., Zhao, Y.,, Sun, W., & Gu, Z. (2009). Evaluating soil quality indices in an agricultural region of Jiangsu Province, China. Geoderma, 149(3-4), 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.12.015
  40. Qiu, X., Peng, D., Wang, H., Wang, Z., & Cheng, S. (2019). Minimum data set for evaluation of stand density effects on soil quality in Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations in North China. Ecological Indicators, 103, 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.010
  41. Ranaivoson, L., Naudin, K., Ripoche, A., Affholder, F., Rabeharisoa, L., & Corbeels, M. (2017). Agro-ecological functions of crop residues under conservation agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0432-z
  42. Saurabh, K., Rao, K. K., Mishra, J. S., Kumar, R., Poonia, S. P., Samal, S. K., Roy, H. S., Dubey, A. K., Choubey A. K., Mondal, S., Bhatt, B. P., Verma, M., & Malik, R. K. (2021). Influence of tillage-based crop establishment and residue management practices on soil quality indices and yield sustainability in rice-wheat cropping system of Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil and Tillage Research, 206, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104841
  43. Schulte, E., & Hopkins, B. (1996). Estimation of organic matter by weight loss-on-ignition. In F. Magdoff et al. (Eds.), Soil Organic Matter: Analysis and Interpretation (pp. 21-31). Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub46.c3
  44. Shao, G., Ai, J., Sun, Q., Hou, L., & Dong, Y. (2020). Soil quality assessment under different forest types in the Mount Tai, central Eastern China. Ecological Indicators, 115, 106439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106439
  45. Sharma, K. L., Grace, J. K., Chandrika, M. S., Vittal, K. P. R., Singh, S. P., Nema, A. K., & Rani, K. U. (2014). Effects of soil management practices on key soil quality indicators and indices in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke)-based system in hot semi-arid Inceptisols. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 45(6), 785-809. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.867048
  46. Sharma, K. L., Srinivasa Rao, C., Chandrika, D. S., Lal, M., Indoria, A. K., Reddy, K. S., & Srinivas, D. K. (2018). Management practices on soil quality indicators and soil quality indices under post monsoon (Rabi) sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in rainfed black soils (Vertisols) of Western India. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 49(13), 1629-1637. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1474901
  47. Sithole, N. J., Magwaza, L. S., & Mafongoya, P. L. (2016). Conservation agriculture and its impact on soil quality and maize yield: A South African perspective. Soil and Tillage Research, 162, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.014
  48. Sylvester, J., Valencia, J., Verchot, L. V., Chirinda, N., Romero Sanchez, M. A., Quintero, M., & Castro-Nunez, A. (2020). A rapid approach for informing the prioritization of degraded agricultural lands for ecological recovery: A case study for Colombia. Journal for Nature Conservation, 58, 125921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125921
  49. Thierfelder, C., Mwila, M., & Rusinamhodzi, L. (2013). Conservation agriculture in eastern and southern provinces of Zambia: Long-term effects on soil quality and maize productivity. Soil and Tillage Research, 126, 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.09.002
  50. Udom, B. E., & Omovbude, S. (2019). Soil physical properties and carbon/nitrogen relationships in stable aggregates under legume and grass fallow. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(1), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2018.05.008
  51. Vallejo, V. E., Afanador, L. N., Hernández, M. A., & Parra, D. C. (2018). Effect of the implementation of different agricultural systems on the soil quality from the municipality of Cachipay, Cundinamarca, Colombia. Bioagro, 30(1), 27-38.
  52. Vallejo, V. E., Roldan, F., & Dick, R. P. (2010). Soil enzymatic activities and microbial biomass in an integrated agroforestry chronosequence compared to monoculture and a native forest of Colombia. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 46(6), 577-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0466-8
  53. Verhulst, N., Carrillo-García, A., Moeller, C., Trethowan, R., Sayre, K. D., & Govaerts, B. (2011). Conservation agriculture for wheat-based cropping systems under gravity irrigation: Increasing resilience through improved soil quality. Plant and Soil, 340(1), 467-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0620-y
  54. Xun, W., Huang, T., Zhao, J., Ran, W., Wang, B., Shen, Q., & Zhang, R. (2015). Environmental conditions rather than microbial inoculum composition determine the bacterial composition, microbial biomass and enzymatic activity of reconstructed soil microbial communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 90, 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.018
  55. Yao, R., Yang, J., Gao, P., Zhang, J., & Jin, W. (2013). Determining minimum data set for soil quality assessment of typical salt-affected farmland in the coastal reclamation area. Soil and Tillage Research, 128, 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.11.007
  56. Zhou, Y., Ma, H., Xie, Y., Jia, X., Su, T., Li, J., & Shen, Y. (2020). Assessment of soil quality indexes for different land use types in typical steppe in the loess hilly area, China. Ecological Indicators, 118, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106743
  57. Zou, X., Zhu, X., Zhu, P., Singh, A. K., Zakari, S., Yang, B., Chen, C., & Liu, W. (2021). Soil quality assessment of different Hevea brasiliensis plantations in tropical China. Journal of Environmental Management, 285, 112147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112147
Agricultura de conservación como estrategia potencial para incrementar la calidad del suelo en agroecosistemas de Colombia . (2022). Ciencia Y Tecnología Agropecuaria, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol23_num3_art:2674
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Metricas

1529 | 873 | 76




 

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

logo co

Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA

Dirección: Km 14 Vía Mosquera - Bogotá
Código Postal: 250047
Horario de Atención: Lunes a Viernes 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m

Contacto

Teléfono Conmutador: (+57 60 1) 4227300
Línea Gratuita: 01 8000 121515
Correo Institucional: atencionalcliente@agrosavia.co
Correo de notificaciones judiciales:
notificacionesjudiciales@agrosavia.co
Línea de atención de denuncias:
somosintegros@agrosavia.co
Política de seguridad de la información

logo co