Ir al contenido principal Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
ISSN:0122-8706 E-ISSN: 2500-5308 DOI: 10.21930

Caracterización multivariada de la faena en pollos para carne, criados bajo diferentes densidades de alojamiento

Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA)
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA)
Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR)
Universidad Nacional del Nordeste (UNNE)

Cómo citar

Caracterización multivariada de la faena en pollos para carne, criados bajo diferentes densidades de alojamiento. (2023). Ciencia Y Tecnología Agropecuaria, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol24_num3_art:3004

Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo fue identificar y caracterizar mediante un enfoque multivariado fuentes de variancia para los caracteres productivos a la faena en pollos broiler machos y hembras criados bajo dos densidades de alojamiento. El trabajo se llevó a cabo en una granja comercial del noreste de Santa Fe, Argentina. Se alojaron 54.000 pollos Cobb500® de un día de edad en lotes mixtos, en dos galpones oscurecidos de ventilación forzada. Se ensayaron dos densidades de alojamiento: densidad estándar (14 pollos/m2 = 29.000 aves) habitualmente utilizada en la granja y densidad reducida (12 pollos/m2 = 25.

000 aves). Las aves se faenaron a los 41 días y se evaluó el peso limpio (PL), el rendimiento de la canal (RC), de pata-muslo (RPM) y de pechuga (RP) y la proporción de grasa (PG). Los datos de las cinco variables se analizaron en forma conjunta, para cada sexo por separado, con la técnica multivariada de componentes principales. Las dos primeras componentes principales (CP1 y CP2) explicaron el 79 % de la variancia total de los datos correspondientes a los machos y el 81 % de los datos de las hembras. CP1 se asoció principalmente con el peso limpio y el rendimiento de la canal y CP2 con el rendimiento de pechuga y pata-muslo y la proporción de grasa abdominal. Los pollos alojados con mayor densidad presentaron mayor rendimiento de la canal, debido, en parte, a la mayor proporción de grasa acumulada en el abdomen, como consecuencia de su crecimiento a un peso final más bajo lo que implica diferencias en el balance energético.

 

753 366
  • aves de corral
  • condiciones ambientales
  • producción industrial
  • rendimiento
  • tasa de crecimiento
  1. Baéza, E., & Le Bihan-Duval, E. (2013). Chicken lines divergent for low or high abdominal fat deposition: a relevant model to study the regulation of energy metabolism. Animal, 7(6), 965-973. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113000153
  2. Benyi, K., Tshilate, T. S., Netshipale, A. J., & Mahlako, K. T. (2015). Effects of genotype and sex on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 47(7), 1225-1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0850-3
  3. Carrasco, J. L., & Hernán, M. A. (1993). Estadística multivariante en las ciencias de la vida. Ediciones Ciencia, 3, 201-213. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=39659
  4. Cengiz, Ö., Köksal, B. H., Tatlı, O., Sevim, Ö., Ahsan, U., Üner, A. G., Ulutaş, P. A., Beyaz, D., Büyükyörük, S., Yakan, A., & Önol, A. G. (2015). Effect of dietary probiotic and high stocking density on the performance, carcass yield, gut microflora, and stress indicators of broilers. Poultry Science, 94(10), 2395-2403. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev194
  5. Deeb, N., & Lamont, S. J. (2002). Genetic architecture of growth and body composition in unique chicken populations. Journal of Heredity, 93(2), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.2.107
  6. dos Santos Henrique, C., Oliveira, A. F., Ferreira, T. S., Silva, E. S., de Mello, B. F., de Freitas Andrade, A., da Silva Freitas Martins, V., de Paula, F. O., de Moraes García, E. R., & Bruno, L. D. (2017). Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb500®. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 38(4), 2705-2717. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2705
  7. Ekmay, R. D., Salas, C., England, J., Cerrate, S., & Coon, C. N. (2013). The effects of age, energy and protein intake on protein turnover and the expression of proteolysis-related genes in the broiler breeder hen. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 164(1), 38-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2012.10.002
  8. Farhadi, D., Hosseini, S. M., & Dezfuli, B. T. (2016). Effect of house type on growth performance, litter quality and incidence of foot lesions in broiler chickens reared in varying stocking density. Journal of BioScience & Biotechnology, 5(1), 69-78. https://doaj.org/article/43d702dbf7bf4c6e97e602abbf1fc0eb
  9. Fouad, A. M., & El-Senousey, H. K. (2014). Nutritional factors affecting abdominal fat deposition in poultry: a review. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 27(7), 1057-1068. http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13702
  10. Jayalakshmi, T., Kumararaj, R., Sivakumar, T., Vanan, T. T., & Thiagarajan, D. (2009). Influence of stocking densities on litter moisture, microbial load, air ammonia concentration and broiler performance. Tamilnadu Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 5(3), 80-86. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/T_Sivakumar2/publication/273127983_Influence_of_stocking_densities_on_litter_moisture_microbial_load_and_air_ammonia_concentration_and_broiler_performance/links/54f842810cf2ccffe9ddc8f1/Influence-of-stocking-densities-on-litter-moisture-microbial-load-and-air-ammonia-concentration-and-broiler-performance.pdf
  11. Jiang, M., Fan, W. L., Xing, S. Y., Wang, J., Li, P., Liu, R. R., Li, Q. H., Zheng, M. Q., Cui, H. X., Wen, J., & Zhao, G. P. (2017). Effects of balanced selection for intramuscular fat and abdominal fat percentage and estimates of genetic parameters. Poultry Science, 96(2), 282-287. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew334
  12. Hassanein, H. H. (2011). Growth performance and carcass yield of broilers as affected by stocking density and enzymatic growth promoters. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 5(2), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2011.94.101
  13. Karakaya, M., Parlat, S. S., Yilmaz, M. T., Yildirim, I., & Ozalp, B. (2009). Growth performance and quality properties of meat from broiler chickens reared under different monochromatic light sources. British Poultry Science, 50(1), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660802629571
  14. Leone, E. H., Christman, M. C., Douglass, L., & Estevez, I. (2010). Separating the impact of group size, density, and enclosure size on broiler movement and space use at a decreasing perimeter to area ratio. Behavioural Processes, 83(1), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.08.009
  15. Madilindi, M. A., Mokobane, A., Letwaba, P. B., Tshilate, T. S., Banga, C. B., Rambau, M. D., Bhebhe, E., & Benyi, K. (2018). Effects of sex and stocking density on the performance of broiler chickens in a sub-tropical environment. South African Journal of Animal Science, 48(3), 459-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v48i3.6
  16. Maharjan, P., Martinez, D. A., Weil, J., Suesuttajit, N., Umberson, C., Mullenix, G., Hilton, K. M., Beitia, A., & Coon, C. N. (2021). Physiological growth trend of current meat broilers and dietary protein and energy management approaches for sustainable broiler production. Animal, 15, 100284.
  17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100284
  18. Marapana, R. A. (2016). Effect of different dress weight categories on yield part percentage and relationship of live and dress weight of broiler carcasses slaughter at different conditions. Journal of food science and technology Nepal, 9, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.3126/jfstn.v9i0.14760
  19. Mebratie, W., Madsen, P., Hawken, R., Romé, H., Marois, D., Henshall, J., Bovenhuis, H., & Jensen, J. (2019). Genetic parameters for body weight and different definitions of residual feed intake in broiler chickens. Genetics Selection Evolution, 51(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0494-2
  20. Mitrović, S. (2010). The influence of population density and duration of breeding on broiler chickens productivity and profitability. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(28), 4486-4490. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296837019_The_influence_of_population_density_and_duration_of_breeding_on_broiler_chickens_productivity_and_profitability
  21. Obeidat, M. D., Al-Tamimi, H., Nusairat, B., & Obeidat, B. S. (2019). Effect of breed and density on growth performance and carcass traits of two broiler breeds. International Congress on Agriculture and Forestry research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332408144_Effect_of_breed_and_density_on_growth_performance_and_carcass_traits_of_two_broiler_breeds
  22. Peertile, S. F., Zampar, A., Petrini, J., Gaya, L. D., Rovadoscki, G. A., Ramírez-Díaz, J., Ferraz, J. B., Michelan Filho, T., & Mourão, G. B. (2014). Correlated responses and genetic parameters for performance and carcass traits in a broiler line. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, 15, 1006-1016. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402014000400008
  23. Sam, I. M., Essien, C. A., Ukpanah, U. A., & Ekpo, J. S. (2019). Influence of Sex on Relationship Between Morphometric Trait Measurement and Carcass Traits in Broiler Chicken Raised in Humid Tropic. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 18(11). http://dx.doi.org/10.36478/javaa.2019.309.314
  24. Shafey, T. M., Alodan, M. A., Hussein, E. O., & Al-Batshan, H. A. (2013). The effect of sex on the accuracy of predicting carcass composition of Ross broiler chickens. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 23(4), 975-980. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270580116_The_effect_of_sex_on_the_accuracy_of_predicting_carcass_composition_of_Ross_broiler_chickens
  25. Tallentire, C. W., Leinonen, I., & Kyriazakis, I. (2018). Artificial selection for improved energy efficiency is reaching its limits in broiler chickens. Scientific reports, 8(1), 1168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19231-2
  26. Tallentire, C. W., Leinonen, I., & Kyriazakis, I. (2016). Breeding for efficiency in the broiler chicken: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0398-2
  27. Tůmová, E., & Teimouri, A. J. (2010). Fat deposition in the broiler chicken: a review. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 41(2), 121-128. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309770077_FAT_DEPOSITION_IN_THE_BROILER_CHICKEN_A_REVIEW
  28. Riber, A. B., Van De Weerd, H. A., De Jong, I. C., & Steenfeldt, S. (2018). Review of environmental enrichment for broiler chickens. Poultry science, 97(2), 378-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex344
  29. Wang, Y. Q., Thomas, B., Ghebremeskel, K., & Crawford, M. A. (2004). Changes in protein and fat balance of some primary foods: implications for obesity. 6th Congress of the International Society for the Study of Fatty Acids and Lipids, Brighton, Reino Unido.
  30. Wang, G., Kim, W. K., Cline, M. A., & Gilbert, E. R. (2017). Factors affecting adipose tissue development in chickens: a review. Poultry Science, 96(10), 3687-3699. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex184
  31. Zuidhof, M. J., Schneider, B. L., Carney, V. L., Korver, D. R., & Robinson, F. E. (2014). Growth, efficiency, and yield of commercial broilers from 1957, 1978, and 2005. Poultry Science, 93(12), 2970-2982. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04291
Caracterización multivariada de la faena en pollos para carne, criados bajo diferentes densidades de alojamiento. (2023). Ciencia Y Tecnología Agropecuaria, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol24_num3_art:3004
Metricas

753 | 366




 

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.